‘Peaceful protestors’ swamped at least one restaurant in NYC recently, and I mean literally swamped. They got in the face of patrons, causing them to flee in fear. In another incident BLM invaded a restaurant and demanded people raise their fist in support. One woman dared to defy them and was targeted. I am willing to bet a number of those that did raise their fist did so out of fear, not support.
In Riotla…I mean Portland they have graduated from commercial grade fireworks to actual weapons of mass destruction, i.e. Molotov cocktails. The ironic thing is one of the rioters was a victim of their own weapon, the result of letting children play with fire. But seriously, a Molotov cocktail is in essence homemade napalm, if made right. And napalm sticks to whatever it hits making it very effective as a weapon. So let’s hear from those that support and justify the action of these ‘protestors’ as the mainstream liars insist on calling them.
The very last resort to restore order to this country is for the Federal government to step in. That is something I do not advocate at this time. Over and above the fact that politically suicide, as a Constitutionalist I don’t want the Federal government involved in something that should be being handled by the State. Note I say ‘should be’. Some Blue states and cities have chosen to instead let anarchists and Marxists terrorize and extort their citizens and burn, loot, and destroy the property of the people they lord over. This is a modern version of “Taxation without representation” with the term ‘representation’ meaning providing the proper level of law enforcement and safety, thus allowing those tax paying citizens to exercise the words of Thomas Jefferson from the Declaration of Independence “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
The following comment is in response to a comment posted by a person that goes by MW in reply to my letter they titled ‘Peaceful Protestors’ With Guns on August 28th.
(Note to a particular person, in answer to your earlier question “Which rights were given by god and which were written by man?” here you go “…that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” I think that pretty well covers it all)
How much longer before people say ordinary say enough is enough.
Everything above has appeared in the Rhino Times Letters to the Editor. Because of space restrictions I was unable to include the following.
What can the Federal government legally do should it choose to? Here are Federal Statutes (not in numerical order) that could allow Federal intervention;
10 U.S. Code § 252 – Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority
Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.
10 U.S. Code § 251 to 254b – Renumbered §§ 240a to 240f] [and] Federal aid for State governments
Whenever there is an insurrection in any State against its government, the President may, upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be convened, call into Federal service such of the militia of the other States, in the number requested by that State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to suppress the insurrection.
10 U.S. Code § 253 – Interference with State and Federal law
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—
(1)
so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(2)
opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.
Alan Marshall
Common Sense Corner 